louiselux: (Default)
[personal profile] louiselux
Anyone fancy a game of Mornington Crescent?

Trondheim rules, but with the 1976 Bovington paradox, which I think we'll find adds quite a bit of excitement to the game!

I'll go first. I'm going to play, hmm: Colindale

Date: 2007-10-18 04:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cutselvage.livejournal.com
Phenomenally played! That move has kindly shifted us into the Trevington-Smythe Inverse Quadrant Phase, allowing shifts on any Friday when used in conjunction with an amended Flynorth diagonal cross-link - which means I can jump to Ruislip Manor.

Date: 2007-10-18 04:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] temaris.livejournal.com
Although I do have to point out -- charming as that move was -- it is in fact Thursday. I think.

Date: 2007-10-18 04:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cutselvage.livejournal.com
(It's Friday where I live!)

Ahem. That is to say, in the Codex of Global Participants, referring specifically to appendix 3.5, section c, those residing in the Pacific area can take advantage of the Trevington-Smyth Inverse Quadrant Phase (hereafter referred to as the T-SIQP) at exactly 12.13am on Fridays. I do believe that makes my move a legal one, though more experienced players are welcome to advise.

Date: 2007-10-18 04:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] temaris.livejournal.com
(hee!)

In which case I withdraw my point of order: a really stonking piece of T-SIQP play too. Jolly good show!

And, with a oblate inversion, I offer Leytonstone.

(and head home for the evening :-) )

Date: 2007-10-19 09:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] louiselux.livejournal.com
Ah, the good old T-SIQP! That brings back such happy memories.

I'm aware I'm courting an outcry here, but I'm going to move to Notting Hill Gate.

Date: 2007-10-19 10:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] temaris.livejournal.com
Oh. Oh dear. I think you'll find that NHG has been played, and I'm almost sure that under the Bovington paradox you're only allowed to play NHG twice whilst in a state of quantum superposition.

I'm really not sure how to resolve this. Could we perhaps put you in a box with some caesium for a while? Or (and failing the availability of radioactive materials) perhaps rock, paper, scissors?

Thuogh I am willing to be corrected on this -- I've checked the rules but the Bovington paradox has always been ... tricky.

Date: 2007-10-19 10:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] louiselux.livejournal.com
How embarrassing!

Sadly, I think the latter Trondheim amendment 958.678c bans the use of caesium in this case because of the fallout from the 1981 Whaling Boat Clause.

One way round it of course is for me to perform an inverse three-point side step, neatly moving me to Lambeth North.

Date: 2007-10-20 11:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cutselvage.livejournal.com
A superb move! I do love a sharply-executed three-point side step.

Hmm. I think a reverse-oblique Towel Shift (Appendix 42 of the "Heart of Gold" Charter, written in - well, no one really knows, but nevermind) may be permissible here, to Elephant and Castle.

Profile

louiselux: (Default)
louiselux

June 2019

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9 101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags