Spoilers: more OotP thoughts
Jun. 22nd, 2003 09:09 amDid anyone else infer from the prophecy that the part Dumbledore left out was that Harry had the potential to become the new dark lord, if he killed Voldemort. After all, Voldemort does *mark him as equal*.
The greatest mystery of all, the thing that Voldemort doesn't feel: I assumed that was love. And when Dumbledore says to Harry that because he feels it, it proves that he still a man...
*Still* a man? And Harry replies by saying that he doesn't want to be human anymore. Who do we know in the book that isn't human, and who doesn't feel love? That line set me up for something that never came.
Admittedly I've only read that chapter once, and now my nearest and dearest has taken the book to work with him, but...did I miss something?
*Was that *still a man* referring to Harry or Voldemort? Wish I had the book here
no subject
Date: 2003-06-22 09:26 pm (UTC)Anyway, to answer your question I assumed that Dumbledore was referring to Voldemort as the unspoken opposite of being a man. Maybe he brought that up to make sure Harry knew how to stay away from the dark side of the force. That adds credence to your Lord Harry theory.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-23 06:31 am (UTC)Yes, it would make sense. My guess is that Dumbledore knew that Harry had used an unforgiveable curse, and wanted to reassure/persuade him that he wasn't going to turn into something like Voldemort.
prophecy
Date: 2003-06-26 06:47 pm (UTC)