The Ecstasy of Gold
Jun. 23rd, 2009 11:46 pmRoger's new Wimbledon kit this year is very shiny. Roger's bag handles co-ordinate with his belt, and under the coat there is a matching waiscoat. This is no ordinary tennis outfit.
It seemed to have upset some critics, not because they don't like the cut of Roger's trews, but because they think that Roger's dress sense is alienating proper manly men from watching tennis, for fear they might suddenly feel compelled to rush out and buy a gold and white manbag. Or something. Rock on, I say.
Belt = bag. *impressed*
In conclusion, Rafa's cheekbones are better than everyone's.
from the comments to the post
Date: 2009-06-24 07:41 am (UTC)I think Nike is limiting sales with Rogers' stuff by turning him out like a poncey poofter, not that I don't love me poofters, but this is tennis, not ice-skating.
right, i'm closing down that window now before i kill someone.
Re: from the comments to the post
Date: 2009-06-24 10:48 pm (UTC)Yes, exactly that! The underlying theme of 'he looks like he might be gay, no proper sport loving man will like him' was so clear. I think he's scared that the US will lose all interest in tennis, and feels that Roger should make more effort to be appealing to the American audience. He also seems to blame Nike for not dressing Roger to appeal to the American market. I just hate this shit. What about the rest of the effing world?
Some of the comments were just awful and made me want to engage in angry shouting on the internets.