Supernatural
Sep. 23rd, 2007 12:48 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Seeing as how
new_kate sent me all of Supernatural (thank you!!) with instructions to watch it ready for
connotations, I've begun my one-woman spn fest. I watched episodes 1-6 of season one last night. My deep thoughts so far ...
Dean Winchester is a huge woobie.
All the women love him, except the women seem essentially unimportant.
Everyone has fabulous hair.
There are not enough shots of Sam and Dean sleeping in their underwear, srsly.
Are Sam and Dean really brothers? I find this hard to believe. They don't act like brothers, exactly. I can't quite say what they are like though.
Dean has lots of delicious unresolved issues that we are left to guess at, whereas Sam is presented more straightforwardly angsting. I can see why Sam might be flipping out now that his girlfriend has died in the same way as his mother, but actually to me it doesn't feel real. It's something to do with the pacing and also because the writers should've developed Jessica as a person more effectively, rather than just dressing her in sexy clothes and letting us assume Sam must love her.
Sam really is a little bit spooky all by himself, having those pre-cognitive dreams about her death.
Coming back to the unimportant women thing, I dearly wish the scriptwriters would move on from women essentially being torture victims/evil/people to scream and be rescued. It's very boring.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
Dean Winchester is a huge woobie.
All the women love him, except the women seem essentially unimportant.
Everyone has fabulous hair.
There are not enough shots of Sam and Dean sleeping in their underwear, srsly.
Are Sam and Dean really brothers? I find this hard to believe. They don't act like brothers, exactly. I can't quite say what they are like though.
Dean has lots of delicious unresolved issues that we are left to guess at, whereas Sam is presented more straightforwardly angsting. I can see why Sam might be flipping out now that his girlfriend has died in the same way as his mother, but actually to me it doesn't feel real. It's something to do with the pacing and also because the writers should've developed Jessica as a person more effectively, rather than just dressing her in sexy clothes and letting us assume Sam must love her.
Sam really is a little bit spooky all by himself, having those pre-cognitive dreams about her death.
Coming back to the unimportant women thing, I dearly wish the scriptwriters would move on from women essentially being torture victims/evil/people to scream and be rescued. It's very boring.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-23 12:00 pm (UTC)They're actually making a big deal about presenting two strong, kick-ass female characters in S3. And of course a good portion of the fandom is screaming 'Mary Sue Love Interests ewww,' despite the fact that the producers insist that's not what will happen, and that-- as you say-- they desperately need strong women characters. S2 is better but I'm kind of excited about S3.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-23 12:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-23 12:46 pm (UTC)Sam really is a little bit spooky all by himself, having those pre-cognitive dreams about her death.
WORD.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-23 01:14 pm (UTC)Please join the fandom-wide chorus of "Oh, Dean."
*g*
Are Sam and Dean really brothers? I find this hard to believe. They don't act like brothers, exactly.
Huh, my impression was actually that they act a LOT like brothers.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-23 01:50 pm (UTC)Dean. Mmmmmmmmmmmm. Dean.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-23 02:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-23 02:51 pm (UTC)Some very strong female characters become involved in later episodes, though the focus always remains on the brothers and most of them aren't recurring. In at least one episode they do kind of get indirectly called on their chivalrous sexism (which is annoying but plausible given the way they were raised without female role models who don't need any protecting, nevermind vengence). By which I mean, some of the writers do seem to be somewhat aware of the character's unintentional sexism in the show, and sometimes use an episode to comment on it.
There do continue to be some skanky race issues which left me very frustrated, because with very few exceptions the writers *don't* seem to be as aware of their racist casting as they are about the sexism. They do some cool things in the one episode where they do explicitly deal with racism, though!
I am still looking forward to season 3, and also to hearing more thoughts from you on the earlier episodes because I've actually seen them recently enough to comment on them, which is rarely the case with my brain and TV. ^_^
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-23 05:39 pm (UTC)I do think they're very brotherly, though in the early episodes they're still sort of getting used to each other again, and also Dean is kind of getting used to seeing Sam as an adult.
And Padalecki's acting is much improved in season 2.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-23 05:55 pm (UTC)...Seriously, the amount of subtext between those two almost wounds me. They act, not like there's this huge amount of UST, or like they're dating, but almost like they're friendly exes, who broke up when Sam went off to school and never quite got over each other but still have enough respect and admiration for the other to pretend like there's nothing there anymore, honest.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-09-24 12:02 am (UTC)*incest vibes? what incest vibes? Brother. Totally brothers. In conclusion : brothers.
(no subject)
From: