Paper or typing?
May. 28th, 2004 11:28 amMy writing output for the past few months has been mostly fragments. It's partly to do with RL intruding but also something to do with the way I write: how I physically get the words down. I often write by hand somewhere where there's no pc. If I don't get something typed up, then I never finish it.
I often (nearly always) start on paper, because I'm often on the train or in the garden when I'm thinking about a story, not at my pc. I don't have a laptop - if I did perhaps that would change things.
Writing on paper is slower and there's always the feeling that when I type it up, I'm going to polish it up and finish it off - very much the feeling that this is a rough copy. It's a guide, and I often find that by the time I'm at the pc, things change quite drastically. I vastly prefer to read my typed rather than handwritten stories. Its simply easier to read a nice neat typed page, rather than a mess of crossings out and inserted, scribbled lines.
The again, I love having that copy, and I find that for short things like drabbles, I can write pretty much the finished thing by hand. Writing things down by hand means there's a paper copy written in a nice coloured pen and more than that, it's a record of my thought processes- you don't get that with typing. I get an obscure pleasure from looking over a handwritten story and seeing the final version peeping out from around the edges of furious crossings out. But then, if I read something on screen, I find it harder to spot errors. I always have to beta on a paper copy, for example, and that's not just because I like to do it in the bath. Only joking. Er.
But the end result is, if I don't get it typed up then it's going to sit unfinished. Physical resources matter too. I simply don’t have enough paper in my small travel notebook to rewrite whole stories. And of course, writing by hand takes longer than typing something, or it does for me at least.
[Poll #300178]
***
I'm off until Wednesday now. Long weekend here I come! After the chores. The house needs cleaning, we seem to have spread every item of clothing we own over the bedroom, the bills need sorting out so goodbye sweet monthly salary. I've eaten too much bread this week so I'm uncomfortably bloated and podgy and my waistband is too tight. But on the upside, I have a party to go to, a pile of postcards to write and send and a birthday present to get, which pretty much means slavering over DVDs in the bowels of HMV. Maybe today is the day to finally get Firefly?
I often (nearly always) start on paper, because I'm often on the train or in the garden when I'm thinking about a story, not at my pc. I don't have a laptop - if I did perhaps that would change things.
Writing on paper is slower and there's always the feeling that when I type it up, I'm going to polish it up and finish it off - very much the feeling that this is a rough copy. It's a guide, and I often find that by the time I'm at the pc, things change quite drastically. I vastly prefer to read my typed rather than handwritten stories. Its simply easier to read a nice neat typed page, rather than a mess of crossings out and inserted, scribbled lines.
The again, I love having that copy, and I find that for short things like drabbles, I can write pretty much the finished thing by hand. Writing things down by hand means there's a paper copy written in a nice coloured pen and more than that, it's a record of my thought processes- you don't get that with typing. I get an obscure pleasure from looking over a handwritten story and seeing the final version peeping out from around the edges of furious crossings out. But then, if I read something on screen, I find it harder to spot errors. I always have to beta on a paper copy, for example, and that's not just because I like to do it in the bath. Only joking. Er.
But the end result is, if I don't get it typed up then it's going to sit unfinished. Physical resources matter too. I simply don’t have enough paper in my small travel notebook to rewrite whole stories. And of course, writing by hand takes longer than typing something, or it does for me at least.
[Poll #300178]
***
I'm off until Wednesday now. Long weekend here I come! After the chores. The house needs cleaning, we seem to have spread every item of clothing we own over the bedroom, the bills need sorting out so goodbye sweet monthly salary. I've eaten too much bread this week so I'm uncomfortably bloated and podgy and my waistband is too tight. But on the upside, I have a party to go to, a pile of postcards to write and send and a birthday present to get, which pretty much means slavering over DVDs in the bowels of HMV. Maybe today is the day to finally get Firefly?
no subject
Date: 2004-05-28 03:55 am (UTC)I would have chosen option three, but sometimes I start in the text processor directly.
seeing as my only publishing method is through the web, the editor is an unavoidable step, but sometimes I can think better with the paper in front of me.
(also, the lure of LJ is too big when I'm at the computer...)
even when I'm typing, I still keep previous versions of the
drivelscribblings, so you'll find things like "ouch.txt", "ouch_v1.txt" till "ouch_v5.txt" (I actually give weird names to the files with a purpose - a "serious" name would jinx them; I have the superstitions, I have the oddness, all I need now is the talent) in the same folder, and a lot of stuff in square brackets inside the files, such as three versions of the same phrase....I'm beginning to understand why I don't finish stuff.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-30 05:43 am (UTC)*giggles* That's a fascinating superstition. What counts as a serious name, the eventual title, or just a word that is serious?
I tend to keep all my versions of stories in the same document, so I'll have all the false starts and cut scenes and general junk either at the beginning or at the end. It helps, somehow. And I get easily confused if I have more than one version of a story.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-31 12:23 am (UTC)I can't even keep the written fragments in one contiguous place, and now I have to hunt them in the whole notebook... to complete the weird tableau, and probably give you serious reason to doubt my sanity, I have to confess I prefer to write in the dark or very faint light, so I can avoid that annoying self-consciousness of reading while writing.
(tangent: I'm proud that I can actually make readable squiggles when I write in the dark. I'm reminded of a Chinese tale where a man had to prove he had learned, really learned, by writing in the dark; I thought it was a piece of cake -- until I tried it myself :D)
no subject
Date: 2004-05-28 04:13 am (UTC)Thief 3 demo comes out tomorrow/today. Prepare your hardware upgrade.
Also, if you don't get Firefly, I may do something drastic.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-30 05:38 am (UTC)But I promise I will buy Firefly!
no subject
Date: 2004-05-30 05:47 am (UTC)Hooray!
no subject
Date: 2004-05-28 04:23 am (UTC)One tip I picked up - from
no subject
Date: 2004-05-30 05:25 am (UTC)That's an interesting tip about breaking writer's block - it definitely works, I think.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-28 06:09 am (UTC)I type at 120 wpm, though, so for speed I write on the PC. Also, if I'm doing something that needs frequent edits, like poetry or drabbles, then I'll use the PC.
I'll write on paper if I only have a note pad handy when an idea hits, or on the computer at work when I'm trying to look busy.
I'm bi-textural.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-30 05:37 am (UTC)For some reason, writing on paper, although a lot slower, helps me with embarrassing things like sex scenes.
Maybe it's because it's slower, it helps?
no subject
Date: 2004-05-28 07:45 am (UTC)I have tried to write down scenes but they really end up bad because I'm such a self-editor that I constantly cross out bits and rewrite them, which is annoying and exhausting on paper.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-30 05:35 am (UTC)Yes, I have exactly the same problem. It's very hard to get the shape of the story in my head if I'm writing on paper, as I obsessively tweak things, sometimes even until it becomes a completely different story. And that's kind of bad, I think.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-28 01:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-30 05:31 am (UTC)Ah, yes. Those three word scenes that you go back to a week later and think, 'so, brain, explain to me exactly what you meant by 'bicycle nail-polish death probe?'
no subject
Date: 2004-05-30 06:33 am (UTC)