louiselux: (Default)
louiselux ([personal profile] louiselux) wrote2002-07-16 04:46 pm

(no subject)

Am experimenting with different types of summary on FF.net, to see how it attracts readers. At the moment I'm going for the slutty angle. Hmmm, *strokes chin thoughtfully*

[identity profile] iibnf.livejournal.com 2002-07-16 03:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Keep us up to date on your research findings?

[identity profile] millefiori.livejournal.com 2002-07-16 07:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, do let us know what you figure out - I'm quite curious. Speaking as a reader, beyond whether or not the plot sounds interesting, I go for intelligent sounding summaries. I tend to avoid stories that have misspellings in the summary, blatant requests for R&R, and comments like 'I know this sucks, but I wrote it in 45 minutes and now it's 3am and I've got a test tomorrow so pleeeeeeze just read it!!!'

(I'll also arbitrarily avoid stories if I don't like the title, or the name of the author, but that's neither here nor there!)

[identity profile] louiselux.livejournal.com 2002-07-17 03:28 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, I thought hard about what made me read a story, and if the summary sounds even halfway intelligent, I'll give it a whirl. I have no idea what attracts most readers though, so I'm trying smut, intelligence and totallly dumb-ass (if I can bring myself to).

[identity profile] luthien.livejournal.com 2002-07-17 01:29 am (UTC)(link)
I'd be curious to hear about your findings, too. I know that my summaries are pretty boring but I have dreadful trouble describing my stories. I usually just want to say "Read the story and find out!" Hmmn, maybe "Lots of hot and graphic m/m sex!!!!!" would work better than "Harry is feeling lost and alone." *g*

[identity profile] louiselux.livejournal.com 2002-07-17 03:30 am (UTC)(link)
I'll keep you all up to date with the results. I already tried a minimal approach (v.brief descripton) -that got me one review.